The Right to Be Lazy
The Right to Be Lazy
What the Lord did on the eighth day the Bible does not state; it is permitted to speculate that He continued to rest and, for all that the last million years’ record shows, never returned to the hectic working spree of the first six days. And when, after another million years, He will be sitting gloriously on His throne, with angels leisurely winging -around Him, He will behold His arrangement with satisfaction and say: All is as it should be. By definition, anyone who can offer Himself such a long vacation must be God; by the same token, the lesser breeds are eating their bread in the sweat of their brow. He will muse upon the sorry fate of the Devil, busily running the world, rushing hither and thither to aggrandize his little kingdom and really leading one hell of an existence. And He will take pity on the damned—Sisyphus rolling his stone uphill, Tantalus hopping for his apples, the Danaides pouring water into the bottomless barrel.
For it’s labor that is Hell and leisure that is Paradise. Mankind knew that even when it was very young. We never got over that first and most effective of all curses which was the punishment for the first sin. The curse has worked well indeed; we still think it’s a sin to revive that blissful state which existed before the Fall. But the wisdom of the people has never forgotten; it imagines Heaven as the absence of pain and effort; it exalts royalty (“The king was in the counting house. . .”) as representatives of the gods on earth—clearly because leisure is the measure of distinction and pleasure is divine.
Anyway, the people have always been wiser than the textbooks; they never believed that wealth makes no man happy. Neither do they believe that riches are usually come by the hard way. Experience shows that the harder the work, the less the pay. The dirtiest jobs are not paid in proportion to the marginal “disutility” or distaste of their execution, but in accordance with the disrepute in which a person stooping to them is held by his equals and betters. Society may teach children that work never dishonors anybody, but when they grow up they would rather work less and receive higher honors.
This, Aristotle would say had he lived to see it, is as Nature would have it; for it is debatable whether those who do the menial work have a soul, whereas those who have leisure to enjoy the pleasures of life must of necessity have richer experience and a larger scope of soul. The more leisure the higher the rank on the social scale. On the other hand, the most effective slogan of revolutionary class hatred has been: he that does not toil neither shall he eat.
That terrible revolution did happen, though the exact time of its happening is not quite clear. Sociologists generally credit the Reformation with bringing about a complete change in people’s attitudes toward work. Martin Luther, it will be remembered, rejected “good works,”...
Subscribe now to read the full article
Online OnlyFor just $19.95 a year, get access to new issues and decades' worth of archives on our site.
|
Print + OnlineFor $35 a year, get new issues delivered to your door and access to our full online archives.
|